Revenge In Julius Caesar Essays - , Term Papers

Revenge in Julius Caesar Revenge. Revenge causes one to act blindly without reason. It is based on the principle of an eye for an eye, however this principle is not always a justified one to follow. In Julius Caesar, Antony seeks to avenge the death of Caesar. Antony acts on emotion which leads to the demise of Brutus, who is a noble man that does not deserve to be killed. Revenge is a central theme within Julius Caesar. This is demonstrated through Antony's desire to avenge Caesar's death, and also the return of Julius Caesar's ghost. Revenge is again exemplified through the violent course of action, which is taken by the Plebeians in an attempt to seek justice for the assassination of their Roman superior. The theme of revenge is evident when Antony demonstrates a desire to avenge Caesar's death. After Caesar's death, Antony swears to take revenge on those who murdered Caesar, And Caesar's spirit, ranging for revenge, With ate by his side come hot from hell, Shall in these confines with a monarch's voice Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war, That this foul deed shall smell above the earth With carrion men, groaning for burial. (Act 3, SC.1, 270-275) This speech is very graphic in nature. Antony describes the upcoming battle as "the dogs of war". Dogs are often depicted in a violent way, which shows that Antony would like to take revenge in a similar violent manner as well. He uses words such as "havoc and "hell". This causes the speech to be dramatic and harsh which demonstrates his rage for revenge. Due to the theme of revenge, he desires to avenge Caesar's death, and this leads to the murder of the conspirators. Revenge is also apparent when Antony organizes an army to defeat the conspirators and brings them to justice. Since revenge is a central theme, Antony uses much effort into organizing the army which will defeat Brutus. He must not only act in front of Brutus so that Brutus will let him make his oration at Caesar's funeral, but he also has to use much effort into composing his oration. When discussing which one of the conspirators should die, Antony suggests that his own brother Publius should also die, These many then shall die; their names are porick'd. Your brother too much die; .. He shall not live... (Act 4, SC.1, 1-6) Due to Antony's agreement upon his brothers' punishment, it is again evident that revenge is a central theme within the play. His rage for Caesar's death is so great that he takes no mercy on the conspirators, even if one of them happens to be his brother. However, not only does Antony desire to avenge Caesar's death, but Caesar himself is also desperate for revenge. The return of Caesar's ghost is yet another event in the play that demonstrates revenge. Caesar's desire to take revenge upon Brutus is shown when his ghost describes Brutus as "Thy evil spirit, Brutus." (Act 4, Sc.3, 281). His sense of revenge is the reason for his ghost's return and its encounter with Brutus, How ill this taper burns! Ha! Who comes here? I think it is the weakness of mine eyes That shapes this monstrous apparition. It comes upon me. Art thou any thing? Art thou some god, some angel, or some devil, That mak'st my blood cold, and my hair to stare? Speak to me what thou art. (Act 4, SC.3, 274-280) As a result of revenge, he returns in the form of a ghost and foreshadows the inevitable price Brutus must pay for his actions, which is death. It is Caesar's deep motive for revenge that keeps his own ghost from rest, and Caesar's ghost will not do so until his death is avenged. Caesar's ghost symbolizes Brutus' inner belief that his end is near; meaning vengeance will take its course. Hence, Caesar's ghost acts as a symbol of revenge. Brutus is so filled with guilt that the mere site of Caesar's ghost overwhelms him with a sense of foreshadowing and death. This fear is revenge by itself. This is clearly shown when Brutus admits to Volumnius that he predicts his death is coming because of the encounter he has with Caesar's ghost, Why, this, Volumnius: The ghost of Caesar hath appear'd to me Two several times by night: at Sardis

Rembrandts Art

Rembrandts Art Born on July 15, 1606 in Leiden, Netherlands, Rembrandt Haarmenson Van Rijn was a Dutch Painter, draftsmen, and etcher during the 17th Century. He was considered a giant in the history of art. His paintings are known for their lavish brushwork, rich color, and a mastery of chiaroscuro. His drawings portray primarily Amsterdam life. Known as the greatest artist of the Dutch School, he was a master of light and shadow and it is readily apparent in his work. (Pioch). It was his use of extreme light to dark contrast values that created interesting effects not being utilized by other painters.Rembrandt was not always destined for the art world. His father had the expectation that his son would take up a learned profession. Rembrandt, however decided to leave the University of Leiden and elected to study painting. In Rembrandt's earlier years his work showed lines, light and shade, and the color of the people he noticed around him.Rembrandt, The Return of the Prodigal Son, 1662–...H e emphasized action, drama, and a high contrast between light and dark. (Pioch).As his work matured it would take on a mellower, more contemplative character. He also began to incorporate warmer, brighter colors. He was able to subtly blend his reflected thoughts and feelings in many of his painting depicting scenes (Pioch).There are many choices when examining Rembrandt's work since he utilized many techniques and mediums. In Sleeping Woman (1660-1669), he provides an excellent example of why many artists prefer drawing with a brush. The reason artists prefer the brush over other tools is that it affords them a sense of immediacy and spontaneity. A Sleeping Woman makes that clear, because "the work seems so spontaneous, so quick an impetuous, that one can imagine Rembrandt drawing the scene quickly, so as not to wake the woman (Sayre 209)."...

To Be or Not To Be Free Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

To Be or Not To Be Free - Essay Example However, one must question themselves and rephrase this interrogation once again: What kind of a world would we be living in if we did not keep a check on or misuse the Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression? Therefore, with reference to this, there have been certain changes made in the European Union Charter with regard to Property laws as well. According to Article 17 of the EU, â€Å"No one may use the rights guaranteed by the Convention to seek the abolition or limitation of rights guaranteed in the Convention. This addresses instances where states seek to restrict a human right in the name of another human right, or where individuals rely on a human right to undermine other human rights (for example, where an individual issues a death threat).† Taking a look at the use of property that comes under it, it has been also stated in the EU that: 1. Everyone has the right to own, use, dispose of and bequeath his or her lawfully acquired possessions. No one may be deprived of his or her possessions, except in the public interest and in the cases and under the conditions provided for by law, subject to fair compensation being paid in good time for their loss. The use of property may be regulated by law insofar as is necessary for the general interest. 2. Intellectual property shall be protected. Therefore, according to this, it is clear that even though a person might have Rights regarding Speech and expression, he or she is not permitted by law to use those rights to undermine the rights of another person.