The Five Best Inaugural Addresses of the 1800s

Interview Of Interview Jen Flemming - 979 Words

I chose to interview Jen Flemming. She is a teacher, mentor, mother, wife, and a leader. I first met Jen when she adopted my little sister. My mother was having a hard time and she needed some help, she could not have hand picked a better person to fill her shoes. Jen was a leader then when she took my sister as her own, and she is also a leader in her career. She is a second grade teacher at Calvin Coolidge Elementary School. I remember when I told her that I was changing my major to Elementary Education. She was very excited and eager to help me along the way. She offered me advice, a listening ear, and helped me find a placement for me pre-practicum. I only wish I had been able to be in her classroom for it! Jen is someone who is always positive, always there to listen, and the first to offer support. I knew that there would be so much I could learn from her. For my research portion I wanted to look at the role of mentoring in developing leadership skills. Jen spoke highly both of having a mentor and being a mentor, so it is something I would like to look into further. I also would like to find a way to utilizing what I am learning not only for myself, but to also be able to implement it into my classroom for my students. I am very interested in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM), and about learning how to encourage my students, especially the female, into fostering an interest in these fields. I looked at an article titled â€Å"Learning by Leading: using best

Samsung and Apple Patent Damages Dispute

Question: Discuss about the Samsung and Apple Patent Damages Dispute. Answer: Introduction Ethical dilemma is defined as a situation in which a preference is required to be made between two options when none of the options is effective in resolving the situation (Widdershoven, Metselaar Molewijk, 2016). The essay discusses Supreme Court sides with Samsung in Apple patent damages dispute. In this assignment, the case study of Supreme Court sides with Samsung in Apple patent damages dispute is analyzed with the help of four classical ethical theories including utilitarianism, deontology, virtue and contract. The scenario illustrates the case study, which reflects, Supreme Court sides with Samsung in Apple patent damages dispute (Balakrishnan, 2017). It has been identified that the supreme court of U.S on Tuesday ruled for Samsung as it has copied various designs from Apple iPhone. In the year 2011, Apple charged Samsung for copying different features of Apple including its colorful grid of app icons. Two lower courts ruled on various design patent infringement of apple and as a result, Samsung paid $ 399 million for infringing the design of Apple. The figure was earned by Samsung from 11 Smartphone models. The penalty was charged according to some federal law, which states that a party that copies as well as applies patented design then they are liable to the total profit (Peters, 2015). However, Samsung countered that the money that is charged is very much disappropriate. The South Korean giant also added that apple is not entitled to the entire profit but to the profit that is gained due to infringing designs from Apple. The justice sent the case to the lower court for further different proceedings. The question that is raised before the Supreme Court is to calculate the amount Samsung needs to pay for copying (Balakrishnan, 2017).Apple discusses the fact with CNBC by illustrating that Apple will continue to protect their years of hard work for being in the same position. It is quite optimistic that the lower court will never send powerful signal that stealing someone else design is right. Utilitarianism The ethical theory of Utilitarianism helps in considering the actions as best if it is helpful in maximizing the utility of the actions (Peters, 2015). As per the theory of Utilitarianism, it is analyzed that Apple has charged Samsung for copying its design and filed a case against Samsung. The lower court asked Samsung to pay $ 399 million, which is collected from 11 Samsung Smartphone models. The action taken by the court is very much important as it helps in maximizing the utility of actions. The penalty, which was, accused on Samsung insights the negative impact of copying. Therefore, the action, which is taken by the court, does not allow Samsung to future copy any of the design from apple. It is also a lesson for all the organizations that copies designs from other companies (Sritharan et al., 2015). The scenario illustrated that copying is a crime and therefore it must be avoided otherwise the party which is accused of copying as well as applying the design will be liable to t he total profit that is gained by the company. Deontology The ethical theory of deontology helps in reviewing the morality of an action, which is fully dependent on some specific rules (Jefferson, 2015). The theory of deontology helps in analyzing the decision that is taking by the court. It is analyzed that in the perspective of Apple, the actions of court is moral because the court charges $399 to Samsung for copying various designs of Apple. The designs that are copied by Samsung includes colorful grid of app icons, which is illegal. One the other hand according to the perspective of Samsung the decision taken by the court is very disappropriate. This is because the court asked Samsung to pay $ 399, which is gained by Samsung after selling 11 Smartphones models. South Korean giant illustrated that Apple must not receive the entire income of Samsung but it is entitled only to the profit, which is gained from various components that infringe (Winters, 2015). However, apple receives the entire income that is gained by Samsung, which is cons idered illegal. However, the federal laws states that anyone who is copying as well as applying the patented design will be liable to provide his total profit which is gained. Virtue The ethical theory of virtue helps in emphasizing the character of an individual as a key element of ethical thinking, which does not depend on the rules (Martinez Wueste, 2016). According to the theory of virtue, it is analyzed that the actions taken by the court is a key element of ethical thinking. The court identified that copying is crime and therefore it charges Samsung to pay $399 as it has copied various designs from the iPhone of Apple including the colorful grid of app icons. The decision of the court plays an important role in identifying the fact the actions of Samsung is an ethical issue and therefore strict rules and regulations are required in order to avoid it. The penalty, which is provided by Samsung, is dependent on the federal laws states that if an individual copies and applies design then the manufacturer is liable to the extent of the total profit gained (Lee, 2015). The action that is taken by the court is considered ethical in the whole scenario, which is ge nerally taken in order to resolve the issue associated with infringement. Contract The ethical theory of contract addresses various questions about the originality of the society as well as about the legitimacy of the authorities of the state (Mazzeo, Hillel Zyontz, 2013). As per the theory of contract, the lower court penalized Samsung for its wrong actions. Apple sued Samsun that it has copied some of its design including the colorful grid of app icons, which is a crime. Therefore, Samsung was penalized and the court asked Samsung to pay $ 399, which is collected by the company by selling 11 other Smartphone designs. Samsung was penalized as per the federal laws (Brean, 2013). The case was sent back to the lower court for its further proceedings. Now different types of questions arises before Supreme Court including the fact how it will calculate the amount, which Samsung has collected by infringing the designs of the Apple. Recommendations There are several recommendations that help in resolving the ethical issue, which is associated with Apple. The recommendations include: Strict rules and policies: The government must implement some strict rules and policies for reducing the issues associated with patent infringement Security and privacy: It is quite important to maintain proper privacy as well as security so that none of the information or features of the products are copied by some other company. Training and development: The employees of Apple must implement various programs associated with training and development in order to provide proper authorization to the features. Conclusion It can be concluded that Samsung was penalized due to its actions of copying the patent designs of Apples iPhone. The actions taken by the court is considered ethical as copying is considered as a crime. The lower court asked Samsung to pay an amount of $ 399 for its immoral activities whereas in the perspective of Samsung the acquisition offered by the court is disappropriate. It is analyzed that the essay helps in providing several recommendations that are helpful in resolving the issues, which are associated with Samsung. References Balakrishnan, A. (2017).Supreme Court sides with Samsung in Apple patent damages dispute.CNBC. Retrieved 5 January 2017, from https://www.cnbc.com/2016/12/06/supreme-court-rules-for-samsung-in-apple-patent-case.html Brean, D. H. (2013). Asserting Patents to Combat Infringement via 3D Printing: It's No'Use'.Fordham Intellectual Property, Media Entertainment Law Journal,23(3). Jefferson, A. (2015). Torbjrn Tannsj: Taking Life: Three Theories on the Ethics of Killing.Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 1-2. Lee, H. K. (2015). Between fan culture and copyright infringement: manga scanlation.Lee, H.K.(2009) Between fan culture and copyright infringement: manga scanlation. Media, Culture Society,36(6), 1011-1022 Martinez, N., Wueste, D. (2016). Balancing theory and practicality: engaging non-ethicists in ethical decision making related to radiological protection.Journal of Radiological Protection,36(4), 832. Mazzeo, M. J., Hillel, J., Zyontz, S. (2013). Explaining the unpredictable: An empirical analysis of US patent infringement awards.International Review of Law and Economics,35, 58-72 Lucas, K., Wee, B., Maat, K. (2016). A method to evaluate equitable accessibility: combining ethical theories and accessibility-based approaches.Transportation,43(3), 473-49 Peters, R. S. (2015).Psychology and Ethical Development (Routledge Revivals): A Collection of Articles on Psychological Theories, Ethical Development and Human Understanding. Routledge. Sritharan, K., Wee, V. M. E., Chin, R. M. Y., Jong, E. E. M. (2015). A case study: the knowledge and awareness levels of copyright infringement among learners utilising digital technologies in Sunway College Johor Bah Widdershoven, G., Metselaar, S., Molewijk, B. (2016). Ethical Theory as Part of Clinical Ethics Support Practice.The American Journal of Bioethics,16(9), 34-36. Winters, K. (2015). Good faith belief of patent invalidity not a valid defence to induced infringement.Journal of Intellectual Property Law Practice, jpv131.

Contract Law Tort Law

Question: Describe about the Contract Law for Tort Law? Answer: Tort Liability In the present case, Mobius and Pythias worked in the factory named Carefull Manufacturing Company from the past two years. Two months back, Mr Wise, who was the owner of the said factory decided to rewire certain parts of the factory and gave the rewiring contract to Mr Damon, who was an electrical contractor and the owner of Damon Electricals. Before Mr. Damon started the rewiring work, he stated his business policy statement to Mr Wise, which was in a form of a waiver stating that Damon Electricals will not be responsible for any loss, damage or injury sustained by anyone who is the client of the company. Last month, Mobius was electrocuted due to negligent wiring done by Damon Company. Pythias who witnessed Mobius from a distance of 75 yards suffered from a severe nervous breakdown. In addition, when Mobiuss wife was informed about her husbands dead suffered from a nervous breakdown As Mobuis was a very popular employee of Carefull Manufacturing Company, all his collegues wished to attend his funeral, which was about 50 miles away from the factory, for the said reason the factory was shut down from 11 a.m on Mobuiss funeral day. The closure of the factory resulted into a loss for business of about 1,000 to the Eatwell Restaurant, which was across the factory road where nearly 400 workers ate lunch every day[1]. Damon who felt very guilty of the whole situation donated 100,000, which he received from recent Euro Lottery winnings of 5m to Mobiuss wife Amelia. The issue in the said case is to discuss the tortuous liability. Tort is a civil wrong, which gives the injured party the option to bring about a civil action. The present case relates to tort action of negligence which can be brought about by Carefull Manufacturing Company against Damon Electricals o the grounds that the negligent rewiring doe by the Damon Company has killed an employee of the Carefull Manufacturing Company and additionally considerably harmed the business and other employees of the said company. Negligence is referred as carelessness in routine life. However, legally negligence has a separate meaning. Legally, negligence is referred as a failure to exercise standard degree of care, which an individual possess as a reasonable person should possess in any given situation, where his failure of duty of care has injured or harm a third party[2]. It is a duty of every individual to take care when the individual foresees that a failure of the said duty will harm or injury a third party. There are certain essential elements that are req uired to be present to prove negligence. The burden of proof in such cases lied on the plaintiff who needs to prove the presence of the following events to establish a valid claim for negligence. The said events are as follows: Duty of care The primary element which a plaintiff needs to establish is that the defendant owed the plaintiff duty to take care. In the famous ginger beer case, Donoghue v. Stevenson, 1932 AC 562, the court explained to whom an individual owes duty of care. The Judge in the said case stated that the people who are closely and directly affected by an act of an individual, which can possibly harm or injure them, in that case the individuals owes a duty of care to anyone who could be so harmed by his actions. Breach of the duty The plaintiff then needs to prove that the defendant who owed duty of care has committed an action or as a result of an omission on his part, the said duty of care is breached. For example, a person walking on the road died after a heavy branch from a tree flew on his head[3]. In this case, the Municipal Corporation of the said area was held for negligence for not maintaining harmful branches that ultimately resulted in someones death[4]. Breach directly caused injury Another event, which the plaintiff needs to prove, is that the breach of duty to take care by the defendant has directly resulted into the injury or damage, which the plaintiff suffered. The injury in this case can be in any form like physical or mental injury, loss of reputation, property damage, etc. In Newman others vUnited Kingdom Medical Research Council (1996) CA, new drug was developed to help children whose growth were stunted. Nearly 2000 children were treated with a drug, which caused their death shortly after consumption. In this case, the Court held that the drug company owed a duty of care and was shut up after compensation was provided to the families of all injured children. When a plaintiff proves the said events, a negligent action can be rightly brought against the defendant. In this cause, the plaintiff can claim for monetary damages, which can be unliquidated in many cases depending upon the facts of each case. The only defences available to a defendant in case he wants to fight back a negligent action claim against him are contributory negligence of the plaintiff, Act of God or inevitable accidents. Many a times, before entering into any service agreement, a waiver is signed which states that the company providing services to an individual or another company will not be responsible for any loss, injury or damage which the service receiving company sustains. This is called a waiver agreement, which can be a separate agreement or a term of the service agreement. However, a waiver signed before getting into any contract does not save the company from extreme personal liability actions[5]. When a company agrees to provide any service to a client, signing a disclaimer or a waiver is not a complete protection against an action for negligence or negligently providing poor services, which harms the company or its employees receiving services from the negligent company. In United Kingdom, the government has introduced a legislation called the Unfair Contract Terms Act, which imposes limits on the extent to which a waiver or a term in a contract can waive or limit personal injury actions or civil liabilities. This means that signing a waiver under the said Act does not restrict civil liabilities for injury or death, which is caused by the negligent actions. In a service contract, the company is vicariously liable for the wrongful and negligent action of its employees f they have supplied or offered poor or negligent services. The principles of vicarious liability are well established and deep rooted in the tort laws established in United Kingdom. Vicarious liability is a secondary or a strict liability that arises out of the common law agency doctrine. The law of agency has created the concept of vicarious liability. This legal concept creates a strict liability on the employer for the negligent actions of its employees if the said actions are committed during the course of employment. To prove vicarious liability against an employer, it is essential to prove that the employee was not working in his personal capacity and injury to an third party is a result of an action the employee has committed during the course of his employment. The essential elements of vicarious liability are as follows: Employer-employee relationship To be successful in a claim for vicarious liability, it is necessary to prove an employer- employee relationship between the wrongdoer and is employer. For the doctrine of respondent superior to be applied, it is necessary that the employer-employee relationship exists for the employer to be responsible for the wrong actions of his employees. This can be proved b simply stating that the employer had control over what the employee does. Another way to prove employee-employer relationship is to check if the employee was hired under ant service of employment or service agreement[6]. Negligence Vicarious liability can be claimed only when the employee does an action or commits an omission which results in breach of duty of care e owes to a third party resulting in the physical or monetary harm of the third party[7]. In the course of employment The claim for vicarious liability is valid only when the negligence is committed in the course of employment by the employee. This means that the said negligence is a result of an authorised act or is under an authorised job, which the employer has ordered the employee to conduct, and the said ob is executed in an improper or negligent manner. The remedies under these cases are usually monetary compensation which the injured party can demand from the employer for the unlawful and negligent actions of the employee committed during the course of employment. In Poland v John Parr and Sons (1927) KB 236 an employee assaulted a boy believing him to be stealing is employers goods. I this case, the Courts held that vicarious liability would be validly imposed based on implied employees authority to safeguard masters goods[8]. In the present case, Carefull Manufacturing Company can claim a tort liability of negligence from Damon Electricals on the grounds of negligently rewiring the said factory which resulted in to the death of an employee named Mobius and many other financial losses[9]. Damon Electricals owed a duty of care to Careful Manufacturing Company when it signed a service contract of rewiring the companys factory. Moreover, Damon Electricals acted negligently in performing rewiring services, which resulted into a breach of duty, that Damon electrical owed to Carefull Manufacturing Company causing injury and damages to the said company[10]. The injury and the damage was the direct cause and result of the negligent service provided by Damon Electricals. Therefore, Carefull Manufacturing Company was legally eligible to sue Damon Electricals under the tort law of negligence. The waiver under the business policy statement that Mr Damon signed with Carefull Manufacturing Company does not give Damon El ectrical an exemption from being sued for the death and injuries caused by their negligent action under the Unfair Contract Terms Act. This Act makes provisions to not restrict civil liabilities for injury or death, which is caused by the negligent actions in United Kingdom. Therefore, Carefull Manufacturing Company can sue Damon Electricals for negligence ignoring the fact that Damon Electricals had made the said company sign a waiver, which makes Damon Electricals free from civil liabilities that can be claimed as a result of any injury damage or harm to its clients. In United Kingdom, the legislation makes provisions for protecting the injured from negligent actions of a third party, when the negligent party has got waiver signed to avoid civil liabilities[11]. The Unfair Contract Terms Act is a masterpiece within the array of tort laws to protect injured from the harsh consequences of signing a waiver, which cannot be relaxed to claim damages[12]. In the preset case, as the employees of Damon Electricals who were engaged in wiring services were acting under the control of Mr Damon who was the owner of Damon Electricals. Therefore, their negligent action in defaulting with the rewiring services makes Mr Damon vicariously liable for the wrongful and negligent actions of its employees[13]. In this case, to prove vicarious liability, Carefull Manufacturing Company will have to prove that the there was an employer-employee relationship between Mr Damon and the employees who worked in Damon Electricals which can be established by the service agreement the employers were signed under or by the fact that Mr Damon had full control over their actions[14]. Once the employer-employee relationship was established, the negligence on part of the employees in conducting wiring services needs to be proved. Lastly, the fact that the negligence was committed during the course of their employment needs to be established. As all these three elemen ts are evident in the present case, it can be legally said that Mr Damson was vicariously liable for the act of his employees in negligently rewiring the Carefull Manufacturing Companys factory which resulted into the death of Mobius and various other monetary losses to the said Company[15]. In the present case, a tortuous liability of negligence is evident and the tort law of vicarious liability can be applied to the said situation as Mr Damon was responsible for the negligent actions of his employees who negligently rewired the Carefull Manufacturing Companys factory which resulted in to the death and many monetary losses to the company. The said Company was shut on the funeral of Mobius, which attracted loss of business, and profits and the Eatwell Restaurant can claim for damages from Damon Electricals for loss of business. Therefore, Mr Damsons waiver or his donation to Mobiuss wife Amelia will not exempt him from civil tort liability of negligence[16]. Reference List Chen-Wishart M, Contract Law (Oxford University Press 2012) 'Editorial Board' (2015) 156 Endocrinology Giliker P, 'Vicarious Liability Or Liability For The Acts Of Others In Tort: A Comparative Perspective' (2011) 2 Journal of European Tort Law Kidner R, Casebook On Torts (Oxford University Press 2012) Kleiman L and Kass D, 'Employer Liability For Hiring And Retaining Unfit Workers: How Employers Can Minimize Their Risks' (2014) 41 Employment Relations Today Koffman L and Macdonald E, The Law Of Contract (Oxford University Press 2010) Lee J and Kim H, 'Countermeasures Against Violation Of Human Rights By Multinational Corporation' (2015) 19 jias Lewis R and Morris A, 'Tort Law Culture In The United Kingdom: Image And Reality In Personal Injury Compensation' (2012) 3 Journal of European Tort Law Macdonald E, Atkins R and Koffman L, Koffman Macdonald's Law Of Contract Markesinis B, Johnston A and Deakin S, Markesinis And Deakin's Tort Law (Oxford University Press 2012) Muchlinski P, 'Limited Liability And Multinational Enterprises: A Case For Reform?' (2010) 34 Cambridge Journal of Economics Pozgar G, Pozgar G and Pozgar G, Legal And Ethical Essentials Of Health Care Administration (Jones Bartlett Learning 2014) Steele J, Tort Law (Oxford University Press, USA 2010) Van Dam C, European Tort Law (OUP Oxford 2013) Visscher L, 'Wrongfulness As A Necessary Cause Of The Losses - Removing An Alleged Difference Between Strict Liability And Negligence' (2011) 2 Economic Analysis of Law Review Weinrib E, The Idea Of Private Law (OUP Oxford 2012) [1] Mindy Chen-Wishart, Contract Law (Oxford University Press 2012). [2] 'Editorial Board' (2015) 156 Endocrinology. [3] Paula Giliker, 'Vicarious Liability Or Liability For The Acts Of Others In Tort: A Comparative Perspective' (2011) 2 Journal of European Tort Law. [4] Richard Kidner, Casebook On Torts (Oxford University Press 2012). [5] Lawrence S. Kleiman and Darrin Kass, 'Employer Liability For Hiring And Retaining Unfit Workers: How Employers Can Minimize Their Risks' (2014) 41 Employment Relations Today. [6] Laurence Koffman and Elizabeth Macdonald, The Law Of Contract (Oxford University Press 2010). [7] Elizabeth Macdonald, Ruth Atkins and Laurence Koffman, Koffman Macdonald's Law Of Contract. [8] Jin Woo Lee and Hyeon Jeong Kim, 'Countermeasures Against Violation Of Human Rights By Multinational Corporation' (2015) 19 jias. [9] Richard Lewis and Annette Morris, 'Tort Law Culture In The United Kingdom: Image And Reality In Personal Injury Compensation' (2012) 3 Journal of European Tort Law. [10] Basil Markesinis, Angus Charles Johnston and S. F Deakin, Markesinis And Deakin's Tort Law (Oxford University Press 2012). [11] P. Muchlinski, 'Limited Liability And Multinational Enterprises: A Case For Reform?' (2010) 34 Cambridge Journal of Economics. [12] L. Visscher, 'Wrongfulness As A Necessary Cause Of The Losses - Removing An Alleged Difference Between Strict Liability And Negligence' (2011) 2 Economic Analysis of Law Review. [13] George D Pozgar, George D Pozgar and George D Pozgar, Legal And Ethical Essentials Of Health Care Administration (Jones Bartlett Learning 2014). [14] Cees Van Dam, European Tort Law (OUP Oxford 2013). [15] Ernest J Weinrib, The Idea Of Private Law (OUP Oxford 2012). [16] Jenny Steele, Tort Law (Oxford University Press, USA 2010).

Revenge In Julius Caesar Essays - , Term Papers

Revenge in Julius Caesar Revenge. Revenge causes one to act blindly without reason. It is based on the principle of an eye for an eye, however this principle is not always a justified one to follow. In Julius Caesar, Antony seeks to avenge the death of Caesar. Antony acts on emotion which leads to the demise of Brutus, who is a noble man that does not deserve to be killed. Revenge is a central theme within Julius Caesar. This is demonstrated through Antony's desire to avenge Caesar's death, and also the return of Julius Caesar's ghost. Revenge is again exemplified through the violent course of action, which is taken by the Plebeians in an attempt to seek justice for the assassination of their Roman superior. The theme of revenge is evident when Antony demonstrates a desire to avenge Caesar's death. After Caesar's death, Antony swears to take revenge on those who murdered Caesar, And Caesar's spirit, ranging for revenge, With ate by his side come hot from hell, Shall in these confines with a monarch's voice Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war, That this foul deed shall smell above the earth With carrion men, groaning for burial. (Act 3, SC.1, 270-275) This speech is very graphic in nature. Antony describes the upcoming battle as "the dogs of war". Dogs are often depicted in a violent way, which shows that Antony would like to take revenge in a similar violent manner as well. He uses words such as "havoc and "hell". This causes the speech to be dramatic and harsh which demonstrates his rage for revenge. Due to the theme of revenge, he desires to avenge Caesar's death, and this leads to the murder of the conspirators. Revenge is also apparent when Antony organizes an army to defeat the conspirators and brings them to justice. Since revenge is a central theme, Antony uses much effort into organizing the army which will defeat Brutus. He must not only act in front of Brutus so that Brutus will let him make his oration at Caesar's funeral, but he also has to use much effort into composing his oration. When discussing which one of the conspirators should die, Antony suggests that his own brother Publius should also die, These many then shall die; their names are porick'd. Your brother too much die; .. He shall not live... (Act 4, SC.1, 1-6) Due to Antony's agreement upon his brothers' punishment, it is again evident that revenge is a central theme within the play. His rage for Caesar's death is so great that he takes no mercy on the conspirators, even if one of them happens to be his brother. However, not only does Antony desire to avenge Caesar's death, but Caesar himself is also desperate for revenge. The return of Caesar's ghost is yet another event in the play that demonstrates revenge. Caesar's desire to take revenge upon Brutus is shown when his ghost describes Brutus as "Thy evil spirit, Brutus." (Act 4, Sc.3, 281). His sense of revenge is the reason for his ghost's return and its encounter with Brutus, How ill this taper burns! Ha! Who comes here? I think it is the weakness of mine eyes That shapes this monstrous apparition. It comes upon me. Art thou any thing? Art thou some god, some angel, or some devil, That mak'st my blood cold, and my hair to stare? Speak to me what thou art. (Act 4, SC.3, 274-280) As a result of revenge, he returns in the form of a ghost and foreshadows the inevitable price Brutus must pay for his actions, which is death. It is Caesar's deep motive for revenge that keeps his own ghost from rest, and Caesar's ghost will not do so until his death is avenged. Caesar's ghost symbolizes Brutus' inner belief that his end is near; meaning vengeance will take its course. Hence, Caesar's ghost acts as a symbol of revenge. Brutus is so filled with guilt that the mere site of Caesar's ghost overwhelms him with a sense of foreshadowing and death. This fear is revenge by itself. This is clearly shown when Brutus admits to Volumnius that he predicts his death is coming because of the encounter he has with Caesar's ghost, Why, this, Volumnius: The ghost of Caesar hath appear'd to me Two several times by night: at Sardis

Rembrandts Art

Rembrandts Art Born on July 15, 1606 in Leiden, Netherlands, Rembrandt Haarmenson Van Rijn was a Dutch Painter, draftsmen, and etcher during the 17th Century. He was considered a giant in the history of art. His paintings are known for their lavish brushwork, rich color, and a mastery of chiaroscuro. His drawings portray primarily Amsterdam life. Known as the greatest artist of the Dutch School, he was a master of light and shadow and it is readily apparent in his work. (Pioch). It was his use of extreme light to dark contrast values that created interesting effects not being utilized by other painters.Rembrandt was not always destined for the art world. His father had the expectation that his son would take up a learned profession. Rembrandt, however decided to leave the University of Leiden and elected to study painting. In Rembrandt's earlier years his work showed lines, light and shade, and the color of the people he noticed around him.Rembrandt, The Return of the Prodigal Son, 1662–...H e emphasized action, drama, and a high contrast between light and dark. (Pioch).As his work matured it would take on a mellower, more contemplative character. He also began to incorporate warmer, brighter colors. He was able to subtly blend his reflected thoughts and feelings in many of his painting depicting scenes (Pioch).There are many choices when examining Rembrandt's work since he utilized many techniques and mediums. In Sleeping Woman (1660-1669), he provides an excellent example of why many artists prefer drawing with a brush. The reason artists prefer the brush over other tools is that it affords them a sense of immediacy and spontaneity. A Sleeping Woman makes that clear, because "the work seems so spontaneous, so quick an impetuous, that one can imagine Rembrandt drawing the scene quickly, so as not to wake the woman (Sayre 209)."...

To Be or Not To Be Free Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

To Be or Not To Be Free - Essay Example However, one must question themselves and rephrase this interrogation once again: What kind of a world would we be living in if we did not keep a check on or misuse the Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression? Therefore, with reference to this, there have been certain changes made in the European Union Charter with regard to Property laws as well. According to Article 17 of the EU, â€Å"No one may use the rights guaranteed by the Convention to seek the abolition or limitation of rights guaranteed in the Convention. This addresses instances where states seek to restrict a human right in the name of another human right, or where individuals rely on a human right to undermine other human rights (for example, where an individual issues a death threat).† Taking a look at the use of property that comes under it, it has been also stated in the EU that: 1. Everyone has the right to own, use, dispose of and bequeath his or her lawfully acquired possessions. No one may be deprived of his or her possessions, except in the public interest and in the cases and under the conditions provided for by law, subject to fair compensation being paid in good time for their loss. The use of property may be regulated by law insofar as is necessary for the general interest. 2. Intellectual property shall be protected. Therefore, according to this, it is clear that even though a person might have Rights regarding Speech and expression, he or she is not permitted by law to use those rights to undermine the rights of another person.